site map

 

November 30, 2006 | Dr. Florence Webb
Believe it or not, brands and brand development may be rising into the public consciousness.

Yesterday on a major television network - okay, it was NBC - the Today Show featured a story about stock photos in ads. The gist of it was that even large companies are using stock pix from the discount aisle at KMart - which means they aren't paying for exclusive rights. And so, the same picture turns up in two or more ads, possbly even for competing products. They showed a dozen examples, from companies as varied as Met Life, J.P.Morgan Chase, Wellpoint, Viagara, and Washington Mutual. The same picture repeated, reversed, sometimes the background used with opposing politicians Photoshopped into the foreground.

What's wrong with this picture? Legally, nothing. But as the piece points out, (wait for it...) it does make it pretty hard to establish the uniqueness of your particular brand.

Dr. Florence Webb Consultant Stokefire Consulting Group
1 Comments
Tate Linden December 3, 2006 12:55 PM

Nice Find Florence!
I think I'm in agreement - using stock photos is certainly more affordable, but for a major brand it just seems careless. But this is more in the advertising realm than in the establishment of a brand...
I'm not an advertising expert, so I'd love to hear from one on this. Are the images used in advertisements valuable, or is it the message that is the trump card?
Given that I spend most of my time helping companies develop their identities so that advertising isn't the primary form of building business I'm not sure my opinion is going to add a lot to the conversation.