Category: Corporate

HR In A Different Place

Somewhere in the world, there are regular kinds of companies who hire people with regular sets of skills to do regularly constructed and clearly described jobs in predictable and repeatable ways.  Somewhere in the world, having all that work out without surprises is the definition of success for the Human Resources department.

And then there’s Stokefire.

When your company is different all the way back to the “why”, you pretty much never get to paint by the numbers.  Which makes recruitment and hiring an interesting and – dare we say it? – different kind of enterprise.  Grab a standardized job description off the Internet?  Don’t check.  Use a blandly worded posting on the usual job sites?  Don’t check.  Look for folks with tons of experience in our own industry, who know all the usual ways of doing things?

Really.  Do. Not. Check.

Because lately, we seem to be developing a corporate personality that’s a little bit cowboy, a little bit missionary, a touch of Thomas Edison and a sprinkle of Bucky Fuller.  We’re turning advertising and branding inside out – and our clients seem to love how it all works.  But one thing about how it all works is that, no matter how entertaining and sometimes even magical it can look from the outside, this is not sleight of hand.  No puff of smoke, no hidden trap doors.  What we do is real.  And it looks like magic mainly because so much that’s done in advertising is everything but real.

What does real mean?  It means we don’t put anything in front of a client that doesn’t add value.  Pretty isn’t enough.  Nice sounding won’t do it.  Fits with the corporate color scheme?  Don’t even get us started.

We do the background work that allows us to spot what’s real about our clients’ products and services, often before the clients have spotted it for themselves.  And whether we’re answering the phone, refining a logo design, or creating a billboard campaign, we need to stay focused on the value proposition of real.  Oh, and of course on the necessity of being leave-you-winded creative and original so the ideas coming out of our shop don’t look like anything you’ve ever seen before.  That too.

So how do you pick new talent to drop into a mix like that?  The first thing is, you don’t look in the usual places and you don’t search using the usual “job posting” prose.  We’ve been experimenting with writing job listings that sound like Stokefire – such as the one we recently used to net our new support person who keeps the office, and the boss, running smoothly.  We placed the ad for only a few days, and got well over a hundred applicants.  Many of them were significantly overqualified.  Of course that’s somewhat a reflection of the state of the economy.  But we also had folks tell us that they wanted, more than anything, to work here.  At Stokefire.  Because of who we are, and why we are.  Because of the real.

Another thing we tried was to build a little test into the actual ad; we asked for some specific information in the cover letter.  Since this was an attention-to-detail kind of a job, we figured that would be a way to identify who paid attention to details.  And sure enough, candidates sorted themselves out (or in) by the way they responded, both to the tone and the specifics.  A few spot checks through the applications in the “no” pile confirmed that those folks who were just responding in a rote way to our ad probably wouldn’t survive a day in our ever-changing environment.

Do you notice the theme here?  All the “tricks” we used were real, specifically designed to elicit honest responses that may not even have felt like responses to the applicants themselves.

It’s a funny thing.  Once you make a commitment to the real, it snowballs until you are compelled to examine every aspect of your operations.  And oddly enough, “the usual” bureaucratic efficiencies rarely fit well with real actions by real people – the results of those generic procedures are all too likely to be generic results.  Just not good enough for Stokefire.

Turning Your Dreams Into Bromides

Can an old chemical term provide insight into the world of taglines and branding?  Tune in and find out!

I was going over some old college textbooks recently (mostly to see if I could finally find a way to part with them) and I came across a notation written by someone evidently smarter than myself in the margin.

It said “BROMIDE!!!”

…and it had an arrow pointing to an underlined phrase… which was “That is neither here nor there.”

I remembered reading something about Bromides from my chemistry classes.  The original meaning of bromide has something to do with a smelly element used in some printing methods.  (Though I think it probably had the name before the printing method was devised…)

Bromide also has another purpose – it is a sedative.

While I evidently hadn’t been interested enough to check this out when it might’ve helped my grades, I was moved to pull a dictionary to learn how this word was repurposed. Answer: Gelett Burgess used the word in a book published in 1906.  The title?  “Are You a Bromide?”  (Full text of the book can be found here.)

To badly summarize the author’s point, he views Bromides as the stuff people say that really doesn’t need to be said at all.  By anyone.  Ever.  (Incidentally the phrases tend to be overly polite, optimistic, trite, and phony.)

He provides examples:

  • “This world is such a small place, after all, isn’t it?”
  • “I’ve had a perfectly charming time!”
  • “Now, DO come and see us!”
  • “Of course if you leave your umbrella at home it is sure to rain!”

Though most of these are a bit out of fashion today, his list does contain some that hit closer to home.

  • “I don’t know much about Art, but I know what I like.”
  • “…she doesn’t look a day over fifty.”
  • “You’ll feel differently about these things when you’re married!”
  • “I thought I loved him at the time, but of course it wasn’t really love.”
  • “I really [shouldn't] tell you this, but…”
  • “…I know you better than you know yourself!”
  • “It isn’t so much the heat as the humidity…”
  • “I don’t know what we ever did without the ______ ….”  [Telephone, Television, Internet, etc...]
  • “You’re a sight for sore eyes”
  • “You can live twenty years in _____ and never know who your next door neighbor is.”
  • “He’s told that lie so often that he believes it himself, now.”
  • “Don’t worry; that won’t help matters any.”

Okay, so the phrasing is a little awkward to parse, but you’ll note that you probably could anticipate how each phrase would end.

There are things that people say that everyone can recite right alongside.  It’s a bit like if I walked into a room of first-graders and shouted “Hickory Dickory Dock!”   Assuming that they’re too young to have listened to Andrew Dice Clay the majority of them would answer my call with something about climbing rodents and timepieces. 

Bromides aren’t worth saying because… well… to use the power of a Bromide… they go without saying.  Or to alter the intent a bit… they are better left unsaid.

So, how does this all relate to a branding and naming blog post? 

While it is possible to achieve success using Bromides or even by being a Bromide (just look at IBM – who became their own metaphor that no one ever got fired for using…) it does take a lot more effort.  And money.  Lots more money.

Consider my old nemesis tagline – “Making Your Dreams A…”

What’s the next word?  Is it “Mess?”  How about “Nice Set of Felted Slippers?”  No, likely it is neither of those things.  Making Your Dreams A Reality is perhaps the most trite of all slogans and is one I’d place firmly in the Bromide category.  Want to become world famous with that tagline?  You’re looking at spending tens of millions of dollars – likely more – to get any notice at all.

A few Bromide Taglines for you to consider:

  • Anything having to do with dreams or ideas and a transition to reality
  • “Our Customers Come First”
  • “You’re Number One”
  • “We’re Number One!”
  • “The Customer Is Always Right”
  • “Best Deals In Town”
  • “All Under One Roof”
  • “We’ll Treat You Right”
  • “We’ve Got What You Need”
  • “See Yourself Here”

This list took me about 35 seconds to make.  I’m sure that given a day I could list a couple hundred.

I can see that having a predictable tagline might be seen as a positive since it would mean people would always be able to recall your brand – but the predictability comes at a cost.  If it is predictable then chances are good the tagline is already attached to something else in the target’s mind.  Or more likely lots of other things.

Worse, the predictability isn’t one born out of any particular level of insight – it’s a bit like a familiar tune or phrase spoken or sung in another language.  We know it because we’ve heard it before – but when we say it ourselves we don’t actually think about the meaning.  As a recovering classical musician I am very familiar with this – I’d have to learn songs in Italian and French – two languages I don’t know anything about.  I can belt out some familiar tunes from The Marriage of Figaro, but I do it out of habit, not comprehension.  I’m pretty sure I’m singing about sending some kid off to war and being broke, but the why’s and how’s aren’t known to me.

Shouldn’t your tagline be more useful than a few noises that remind people of your brand without adding any value?  (Especially when everyone else is using exactly the same noises?)

C’mon folks.  I’m sure y’all have a lot more examples of some popular Bromide taglines.

Drop a comment and let’s see ‘em.  (Who knows, maybe we can start a revolution against crappy branding.  We can predictably guarantee that “the revolution will not be televised.”)

(…sorry.)

The All-Everything Name

Managing expectations is one of the hardest parts of developing powerful names. We work hard at the beginning of a project to ensure that expectations are set correctly. There’s a misconception that names can do absolutely everything for a company. For example, here’s a (slightly modified) list of things a client wanted from their name on a recent contract – before we helped them pare it down.

  • The name should not use any of the current buzz words or industry descriptors
  • The name should double as the new industry terminology of choice
  • The name should publicize both the existing industry and our own company
  • The name should be easy to say and spell
  • The name should not feel out of place amongst the existing company names in the space, but should still be unique.
  • The name should be intuitive
  • The name should make people feel good about being associated with us
  • The name should attract upper-echelon clients
  • The name shouldn’t alienate or existing lower caste clients
  • The name should help to keep clients engaged with us for multiple purchases
  • The name should be progressive and contemporary but should not need to be renamed again due to it going out of style.

The list went on from there. And it got even more conflicted as we got into it.


Let me be very clear: Names are the starting block, not the finish line. A good name can help set you apart from your competitors – and can perhaps help with a couple other goals as well… but it cannot get you repeat customers in most situations.


You cannot, I’m afraid, have a name that does absolutely everything for your company. You also cannot have a name that doesn’t have at least a few drawbacks. All the best names in the business have flaws – Google sounds like baby-speak, Caterpillars are squishy and eat crops… But the names set them apart – allowing them to get noticed and position themselves versus the competition. From there the companies can take over.


Memorability, evocativeness, pronunciation, strategic fit… these are things we can work on with a name. (We have twenty-six other variables we throw in there too… but you can’t have a name with all thirty variables pegged at “10.”)


For anyone out there struggling to find the perfect name… just stop. Perfection is not attainable. When you break a name into its constituent variables some will be strong and others won’t. Just ensure that the portions that you’re leveraging the most for your business are associated with the strong aspects of your name and you’ll be set.


Forget the All-Everything name. Just try to get one that is good at something while avoiding any major pitfalls. You’ll be so far ahead of most other companies that you’ll forget you ever wanted anything more.

The Office Names Names

Yep. I’m addicted to The Office – and am not quite sure what I’ll do to recreate those uncomfortable laughs I’ve become accustomed to for the off season.


But this post isn’t about my love for the NBC show, it is about the website and company names mentioned on the show’s season finale.


The website mentioned? Try: www.creedthoughts.gov.www/creedthoughts. Yeah – it doesn’t go anywhere. But you wouldn’t believe the number of hits that “creedthoughts” is getting all over the internet. Someone had the foresight to register creedthoughts.com a week before the episode aired (one can only assume someone on the production staff did it to prevent someone else from profiting) but the .net and a few other sites were snapped up shortly after the line was spoken.


As far as names go – I actually quite like “Creedthoughts”. I imagine that for lovers of the show the site would speak directly to those who wonder “what the hell is he thinking?” and it would attract quite a crowd of regular readers. Much like schrutespace, I suppose.


UPDATE: There IS a creedthoughts blog. It is here.


The show did have a rather uncomfortable naming-related moment when Michael Scott wraps up his interview with David Wallace (CFO of Dunder Mifflin):

David: What do you think we could be doing better?


Michael: I’ve never been a big fan of the name Dunder Mifflin. I was thinking we could name the company something like “Paper Great”. Where great paper is our passion. We’re grrrrreeeat! I dunno. Could be good. Or, uh, “Super Duper Paper”. It’s super duper. I dunno. Something like that.


Interviewer: Okay.


Michael: Okay.


Interviewer: Thanks for coming in Michael.

What scares me the most is that this sort of thing really does happen in conversations with prospects and clients. I’ll be the first to admit that client-submitted ideas often do quite well and we can build strong identities around them. However… In this case I just was made uncomfortable on every possible level. Wonderfully so, but… still…
And if anyone is interested, both www.superduperpaper.com and www.papergreat.com are available for immediate camping and opportunistic exploitation as of 11:47 EDT on Friday, May 18th. Imagine the peaks in traffic you’ll get when the DVD launches!

No, you don’t need a big-time naming consultant…

…but sometimes it can help.


VIMO – a search and comparison engine for finding doctors announced a new name in 2006. They used to be “Healthia.”


I personally have no problem with the name VIMO – it evokes the concept of Wine for me – as in “Vino”. This led immediately to a connection with the toast “To Your Health!” And that seemed to make at least a little bit of sense to me.


This, however was not what the company leaders apparently intended. Here is a quote from a VC blogger who wrote about it last year:

So the folks at Healthia were happy to announce yesterday that they have selected a long term moniker for their company (and without retaining a “naming consultant”). The new name Vimo evokes:


(i) vim, as in health, vigor, and vitality;


(ii) the Gujarati word vimo, meaning insurance;


(iii) the Swahili vimo, meaning measurements and also stature;


and, most importantly


(iv) the urban slang vimo meaning sexy, cool and impeccable.

I was unable to figure out where the blogger got the connotations from (The press release doesn’t mention them) but I hope that the justifications he provides aren’t the ones they used.


Here’s why -

  1. VIMO doesn’t connect strongly to “vim.” Why? Because Vimo appears to naturally be pronounced “Vee-Moe.” While I don’t condone it, if you wanted to make the connection with vim noticeable you’d have to play with capitalization – like “VIMo” or “VimO” – or you could force the correct pronunciation by using “Vimmo.”
  2. Given that the service is sold in the United States and that their target customer likely speaks neither Gujarati nor Swahili, the fact that the name has meaning in those languages means absolutely nothing to the consumer. Since the service being sold is a portal and not an end-use (e.g., they are going to find someone who will solve a problem – and that someone will require a discussion or visit off the website) there is no incentive to stay with the site long enough to have these definitions sink in.
  3. The urban slang dictionary is notorious for having bogus definitions. Most of the terms in it appear to be from people trying to make up new trendy-speak so that they can say they started it all.

Still, this isn’t a bad name – and I’d even go so far as to say it is a good one. Nice length, nice sound, fun to say…


The place where the name falls down (and where a naming consultancy can help) is in telling the story. Rather than telling people what the name evokes:

“Our new name, Vimo, communicates vim, vigor, energy and enthusiasm — collectively characterizing our commitment to empowering consumers in their quest for reliable healthcare information,”…

… the leadership could make a stronger connection. Sure, the first three letters spell “vim” but where is the rest of that communication coming from? The letters themselves? The implication that wine is involved? And then there’s the question of how “vim, vigor, energy and enthusiasm” characterize a commitment to empowering consumers to do anything. It just sounds like marketing-speak to me.


I can’t stand marketing speak. As soon as I start hearing words like “paragon” or having a search engine described as enabling a “quest” I just tune out. Does anyone out there listen to this stuff? I certainly hope that the stories Stokefire builds actually sound like something people might say in real life.


Vimo is a fine name. Just give the bogus stuff a rest and speak with your own voice. Leverage the more obvious meanings not the hidden ones… and tell it like it is.


I wish you all a pleasant start to your day, and may you have the best of occurences coincidentally befall you as you progress towards the darkening hour.


Tate Linden
Principal – Stokefire
703-778-9925

Now Hiring: THIS GUY

This week’s New York Times, Boston Globe (and any other papers that carry Rob Walker‘s “Consumed”) had an article featuring Scott Campbell - a NYC tattoo artist(e?) that’s been making waves in the corporate world. He’s done work for Nike, Camel, Volkswagen, ZZ Top, and more. Personally I’m dying to talk to him. Not just about his artwork (which is quite cool) but about what he thinks about the concept of corporate tattoos in general.


sf_logo.jpg


I’ve still be mulling over the whole idea of what makes a brand tattoo-worthy, and considering (much to my wife’s and my religion’s disapproval) putting a little corporate logo of my own somewhere the sun doesn’t typically shine.


What intrigues me most about Scott’s work is his emphasis on authenticity. For a guy working on very corporate projects it seems like authenticity is a difficult thing to maintain. This isn’t inking skin, it’s painting pictures. It is a very thin line he must walk – and I must admit he seems to be doing a good job of it.


Scott – if you’re listening out there – I’m curious to know if anyone has taken the corporate work you’ve done for posters or signage and had you ink their bodies with it. Are there people with your cool Camel logo walkin’ around?


Other questions to consider:

  1. Is there a difference between the artwork done on behalf of a person and for a company? Is your process different when developing the design?
  2. How real is the danger of losing the authenticity-factor when getting paid by Nike? How do you stay ‘real’?
  3. Among tattoo artists is there a level of respect given to a person getting a tattoo of their own design that isn’t there if they choose a corporate logo or common rose/thorn type design?

I didn’t say the questions made a lot of sense… they’re just things I’m curious about.


If you’re interested in this sort of stuff you might want to read this post about people branding themselves with the logos of the corporations they respect. I’ve heard Apple, Harley Davidson, and Nike are some of the most common tattoos out there – and there are whole websites dedicated to variations on each. The fact that most companies don’t have this sort of loyalty fascinates me. Why aren’t there people showing off their HP tattoos, or Safeway… or McDonalds?


I hope to have an answer to these questions later this year… but if you think you know the answer now I’d love to hear it.


Oh – and that Stokefire logo on this post – that’s our new one! Here’s to hoping that you can see the tattoo influence on the style…


Tate Linden
Principal – Stokefire
703-778-9925

You want my wife to use WHAT, now?

I6.jpg‘ll be the first to tell you that I’ve got a really cool wife. She’s stylish, smart, funny, and there’s that whole thing about her carrying my unborn child that makes her all the more appealing…


Anyhow, my wife was flipping through a magazine about pregnancy and came across this great little invention that is basically a soft and stylish blanket with a short strap that links around the neck of a nursing mother so that the little tyke can drink in privacy. The product is made by BEBE AU LAIT – a very classy sounding company in this namer’s opinion. Even the tagline, “nursing covers for chic mothers” points to upscale and stylish customers. So it rather makes me wonder what the heck they were thinking when they named this spiffy new product…






Hooter Hiders(tm)


Really. That’s the name.


Apparently it got the name because some male friend called it that upon seeing it in use.


I must admit that the name is quite descriptive.


But, no, I don’t like it.


My reasons:

  1. When was the last time you heard a style-conscious breast-feeding mom refer to her life-giving breasts as “hooters?”hooters_triplets.jpg
  2. The disconnect between the word “chic” and “hooters” is huge. In fact, when searching the internet for “Chic Hooters” I found many hits. All of them seem to be porn sites that evidently can’t spell “Chick.” Imagine walking into a trendy boutique in New York… now ask yourself if you’d expect to see the bra section labeled “hooter holders.”
  3. If a husband is going to buy his wife something for her… assets… I’m guessing more often than not it is going to involve the displaying of said assets rather than the hiding of them. Why does this matter? Because the name “Hooter Hiders” is a name that I believe is more targeted at the male psyche than the female one. Think I’m being stupid? Ask yourself this: Why aren’t there any companies marketing breast pumps as “Knocker Kneaders?” I don’t think it has anything to do with the fact that men aren’t good at spelling silent letters.
  4. It is never a good idea to go up against La Leche League. Based on what I’ve read of theirs (and I do like ‘em… I really do) it seems that anything that inhibits the fresh-air experience of breast feeding in public is to be shunned. The Courts often support them. Feeding an infant is pretty-much the only time a woman’s breast can be publicly displayed in the United States while staying within the bounds of the law. Upsetting a bunch of lactating women by suggesting that they abandon their rights… yeah… not so smart.
  5. You will never get any desireable spokespeople to stand up and proclaim your product is worthwhile. Can you imagine Oprah, Gweneth, or Angelina saying they can’t live without Hooter Hiders? Anna Nicole (GRHS) might have been up to the challenge, but few others would dare.
  6. EXTRAFUNTIMEBONUS Reason: The name logically doesn’t work. Hooter (singular) Hiders (plural) implies one of a few things. Choose from a sampling:
    1. More than one of the product is needed to entirely hide one hooter
    2. Only one breast should be hidden
    3. The product is sold in packs (and thus must be referred to with the plural) like Huggies.
    4. A secret membership organization that advocates either:
      1. Going around placing one of their breasts in hard to find locations OR
      2. Finding owls and forcing them into said hard to find locations (presumably after aforementioned breasts have been removed.)
  • Note that there’s a pretty good reason they likely didn’t go with the grammatically correct version of “Hooters Hider” since it would be homonymic with “Hooter Cider” and I’m thinkin’ that wouldn’t go over well.

There are a couple of ways that the name could work – but they’re even more risky than I would personally advocate for

  1. Get the backing of La Leche League and use this as a way to dissuede the populace from asking to have breast-feeding women cover their breasts. Make them use to “proper name” for the product. “Oh, you mean you want me to pull out my Hooter Hiders? Sure… just ask me to use it and I’ll do so.” Most of the people offended by the sight of a woman’s breast probably will have trouble saying the word “breast” so I’m guessing that “Hooter” will be a near impossibility.
  2. Market ‘em to husbands. Instead of going for chic and trendy go for comical. Have the designs show a woman holding a big bottle of beer up to her chest instead of a kid.
  3. Wait for the next “Sex and the City” type show or movie and pay major bucks to get the product mentioned in the script or used by one of the sexy progressive women.

If Hooter Hiders does choose to market to men I know just the professional race car driver to pitch the product.


Until then this one goes in my naming Misstep Hall o’ Shame. (I may change my opinion of the kind folks at BEBE AU LAIT send us a sample and my wife can actually use it and also tell her grandma what it is. I think I’m safe in saying that she won’t be able to bring herself to do so…)


Tate Linden
Principal – Stokefire
703-778-9925

News Links – 3-27-07

Time Shutters Life

Three years after relaunching Life magazine as a newspaper supplement, its third incarnation, Time Inc. said it would fold the title with the April 20 issue, citing the decline in the newspaper business and outlook for ad revenue in the newspaper supplement category.

The iconic titles name, which will continue to operate online and through its books, had begun to find its footing after rocky start since its most recent reincarnation.

Zune: Fast and Full? Lexicon versus Ballmer

It’s pretty well known that when Microsoft wanted to develop a cool name for their new music player – Microsoft’s attempt at taking a chunk of business away from Apple’s iPod – they contacted one of the biggest branding houses in the business – Lexicon.


Lexicon developed the name Zune – a name that seems to connect with the word “tune” and has a “z” at the beginning of it. Lexicon’s staff used words like “fast” and “full” (focusing on the zoominess of the Z and the roundness of the “ooh” sound) to describe what the name does for the product. When Lexicon talks about it the brand sounds almost well put together.


Steve Ballmer evidently didn’t get the memo, however.


When asked what the name means he responded, “It means nothing. It’s just a cool name.” (listen for the quote in this YouTube video at about 1:01 into the clip.)


Sadly this sort of thing happens all the time. Someone, be it a naming firm or an internal asset, develops a name and finds all sorts of interesting factoids or associations about the name, goes to the trouble of creating an identity. The branding team embraces that identity and works hard to make it compelling.


But somewhere along the line someone forgets to brief the CEO. Or maybe they do brief him and he’s got other things on his mind. The problem is that the CEO isn’t actually involved in the branding process (or at least I would guess that is the case here.) If the folks at the top aren’t involved and haven’t been brought up to speed then all the work done by the branding team is pretty much worthless.


If I say we chose a name for the next new thing because it is laden with connotations and my CEO says it’s meaningless, what does that say about the product, the name, the CEO, and me? Pretty much nothing good:

  • The product doesn’t have anything interesting enough about it to get the attention of the CEO – or he’d have been involved in the branding process
  • The name isn’t compelling enough to engage the interest of the CEO to the point where he knows what it means
  • The CEO doesn’t value the work done by his branding team and marketing staff enough to remember it
  • The branding team produces work that gets ignored by the guy footing the bill. How good can the work actually be?

It’s stuff like this that shows the importance of executive involvement and buy-in. Just saying you’re willing to pay for a name isn’t enough. You gotta be up to speed.


I wonder how many other naming organizations won’t take a project if the top-level representatives of the brand aren’t on board? We won’t take a job in which we can’t access the top of the pyramid. It wasn’t always this way, but we’ve had issues just like this – where we build the brand and either the brand gets canned before launch or the launch gets completely bungled because the senior executives didn’t read a positioning brief that clearly states the whats and whys of the brand – and instead went with gut instinct. Imagine the horror experienced by a marketing team that is ready to roll out a fun-loving brand identity only to hear their leader convey the importance of gravity and attention to detail just days before the rollout. newcoke-can.jpg


We’ve learned our lesson.


It’s been quite a while since we would take on branding engagements where the top of the pyramid can’t be found. In fact, we’ve even made senior executive sign-off part of our contract. We’re not done until the CEO types can convincingly represent the brand identity. If they don’t believe in and understand the brand then we’ve still got work to do.


Side note: Just because the CEO understands the brand doesn’t mean that it will be successful. New Coke went down in flames even though the company leadership was thoroughly behind it. Bringing customers and membership along is a different issue – and one that we’ve addressed in the Optiva threads.


I’m sure other namers have some horror stories here… Maybe someone else can share. I’m especially interested to hear from Lexicon about how they responded to the Ballmer slip-up.


Tate Linden
Principal Consultant
Stokefire Consulting Group
703-778-9925

News Links – 3-23-07

Monster launches new product

monster.gif


Monster Worldwide Inc. launched a new recruitment media product designed to aid employers in seeking people who are not actively looking for a job.



Subscribe to our newsletter »

@Stokefire Tweets

Archives