site map

 

Thingnamer Banner

February 7, 2007 | Tate Linden
Some call it "corn mushrooms" or "the fungus delicacy that attaches itself to corn." But those that don't have the gift of marketing-speak seem to talk a little more freely. Consider "Corn Smut," for instance.

Or my favorite... (Boy I wish I could make this more suspenseful...)

"Sleepy excrement"

The product? Huitlacoche. (or Cuitlacoche)

Hunghuitlacoche2.jpgry yet? Just wait!

From recipes to go:
...common in central Mexico; during the rainy season, a fungus develops between the husks andhuitlacoche.jpg the ripe kernels where the kernels will blacken, contort and swell to form this musty fungus; valued for centuries in Mexico; has an earthy and distinct taste finally similar to mushrooms or truffles; lends a black hue and resonant aroma to stuffings for empanadas, tamales and quesadillas; makes distinctive sauces; usually sold cut from the cob and frozen; needs cooking to release flavor and aroma; often sautéed with roasted garlic and onions, and either fresh marjoram, oregano or epazote, then simmered with a little water or stock; harvested during the rainy season, usually late spring to early fall.
This lovely delicacy has been the target of USDA eradication efforts (they view it as a blight) - which may be one of the reasons why it is so darn hard to find in the States.

cuit4.jpgIn the late 1980s the James Beard House attempted to popularize the food by calling it "Mexican truffle," and some unknown marketer calls it"corn caviar."

This post was inspired by an old blog post at TheSneeze.com wherein the author eats an entire can of the stuff. You gotta go read it - mainly to see pictures of what they put in the can. (Imagine corn on steroids. Now imagine corn on steroids getting covered in mold. Oh. And filled with puss, too.)

Why am I writing about this on a naming blog? Because I think this is an excellent example of a product that ain't gonna benefit from a name change - no matter how great that name change is. Call it Ambrosia, call it Cocaine, or call it McDonalds... the name won't help it. It still looks like doo-doo (those Aztecs were smart.)

Remember the "You're soaking in it" tagline? Or secretly replacing the house coffee? That's just about the only approach that I could see working here. Hide the food inside stuff that people can't see and then surprise the audience with the fact that they just ate some really good tasting... mold. cuit3.jpg

On second thought, perhaps that won't work. I smell lawsuits.

Fellow namers - what do you think? Could you name (and brand) this well enough to make it a popular delicacy in the US? (No fair paying Oprah and Michael Jordan to endorse it. The Corn Smut lobby couldn't afford it.)

This one is beyond my pay grade.

Tate Linden Principal Consultant Stokefire Consulting Group 703-778-9925
3 Comments
Nancy Friedman February 7, 2007 3:25 PM

Hey, I love huitlacoche! I'd rather gather my "smut" from corn than from some of the other stuff fungus grows on. (Don't ask.) But for the general U.S. populace, "Aztec truffles" or "trufa de maiz" (corn truffle) or "field mushrooms" might work.

Tate Linden February 7, 2007 4:02 PM

I think I've probably tried it inadvertently when ordering Mexican food on my drives on Route 66. There was some odd lookin' relish in a few dishes. Can't say I loved it, but I did eat it.
I like the "Aztec truffles" angle. I think my problem with any name, though, is that it still refers to unaltered diseased corn. Would it taste as good in an unrecognizable mash - like a blended salsa sort of thing? (I got my wife to eat Unagi the first time because it looked like fish. She loved it... until I told her it was eel. The psychological barrier made her not like it after that. At least for a couple months - after which she got over it and started ordering it proudly.)
Another thought. Can you imagine the first person that saw a stalk of rotten corn and had the courage to try it? Did they have bar bets back then?

michael February 10, 2007 3:54 PM