Forgiveness as Policy

What happens to an organization the moment its strongest personality walks out the door? This series, Lessons From a Fictional Football Club, turns to Ted Lasso as an unlikely case study, treating it as a structural experiment in what actually holds an organization together under pressure, versus what was just one person's charisma wearing a disguise. Across this series, I will pull leadership lessons from specific scenes, ground them in research where it exists, and close with structural reads through the Loadmap framework, all in service of one question worth asking about your own team: when you leave the room, what keeps running?

Late in the first season of Ted Lasso, the owner (Rebecca) confesses an awful secret to Ted. She’d hired him hoping that he’d fail. She’d spent months making sure of it... feeding stories to the press, trading away top talent, and working against the club, because hurting the club was the only way left to hurt her terrible ex-husband who used to own it. She unburdened everything, clearly expecting to be slammed for it.

But Ted forgives her before she finishes the sentence. And then... he asks if she’s okay.

How’s that for a management decision? She confessed to sabotage. That’s the sort of thing you’d expect would minimally create anger, and maybe result in a big lawsuit. And he’d be justified in either. He heard all of it and forgave it anyway.But I want to focus on what happened before she confessed. She consciously chose to do the right - and difficult - thing. Which meant that at some level she felt it was safe to do so.

You can’t learn what’s safe in an organization by reading the handbook. You learn it by watching what happens to the last person who shared a hard truth, or admitted a mistake. That outcome outweighs the entire universe of inspirational posters about open communication and trust. 

If Ted had spent his time with the team ripping into anyone who brought him bad news or a subpar performance, would a confession have happened? 

When truth is punished, it learns how to hide. Mistakes are buried, bad news is hidden in footnotes, issues aren’t escalated, and leadership ends up running the shop based on fiction they’ve trained their team to write for them. In places where confession is survivable, truth is more likely to show up with enough time to prevent or minimize damage. Prof. Amy Edmondson has researched psychological safety for years and found evidence long ago that teams where people feel safe telling the truth are better learners, and get better results. I’m not suggesting that the right thing to do is to forgive everything instantly, though. That’s just a different flavor of leadership blindness. The show doesn’t push things that far, either. A few posts back I mentioned the scene where Nate tears down the BELIEVE sign, and joins a team bent on destroying Ted’s squad. When he finally comes back, he’s not just waved through. He admits fault and begins to do the work to repair the trust he’d damaged before he’s allowed back in the building. Forgiveness when it’s easy is just good manners. Forgiveness that’s still on the table when lines have been crossed is something deeper. It’s not automatic, it’s earned. And when that exists, I think everyone in the organization can sense it. 

Every sizable organization has two rule books: the one that you get when you’re hired (and probably never read) and the one people actually live by, but only the second one actually controls anything. The second one is never printed on paper. It gets written in memorable moments shared among employees. Rebecca’s confession becomes one of those the moment it’s shared outside of her office. If the team knows he forgave that, there’s reason to believe that whatever’s wrong, he’s going to accept it and help the team move through it. 

Leaders are writing the rulebook constantly. Most of the time it’s little edits. A handful of times a year - when things are under pressure - new sections can get added, usually without realizing it happened. Publicly scolding the employee who stopped the manufacturing line with a false alarm writes a new rule: “Don’t stop the manufacturing line if you’re not 100% sure there’s a problem.” That new rule could cost the organization money, clients, and maybe even the lives of its employees.

If you’re looking for a way to get better at writing rules that help your organization grow, I’ve got something you can practice. Next time someone comes to you and admits a mistake, respond to their courage before responding to the thing they did wrong. Nothing huge - just a “thanks for giving it to me straight, that’s not always easy to do.” Then deal with whatever the issue is. And watch what that person brings you, and what others do, over the coming weeks. Because the story of the acceptance is likely to travel faster and wider than anything you might put in the printed rulebook.

Our organizations’ most serious problems may not be what we think they are. It’s not the broken machine or the projected missed performance targets. It’s the cost of confessing that those problems exist, which can be more than any employee is willing to pay. 

If you’re constantly surprised by last-minute issues in your office, and spend your days putting out fires, it might be worth taking a beat so you can figure out what the cost of confession is in your shop, and who set that price. 

Lessons from a Fictional Football Club is a series of unofficial analysis and commentary. It is not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by Apple, Warner Bros., or anyone connected with the television series Ted Lasso. Loadmap is the framework I think with in these posts. Loadmap, by Tate Linden, is offered exclusively by Stokefire. 

Get The Load directly in your inbox