Whose Town Is This

What happens to an organization the moment its strongest personality walks out the door? This series, Lessons From a Fictional Football Club, turns to Ted Lasso as an unlikely case study, treating it as a structural experiment in what actually holds an organization together under pressure, versus what was just one person's charisma wearing a disguise. Across this series, I will pull leadership lessons from specific scenes, ground them in research where it exists, and close with structural reads through the Loadmap framework, all in service of one question worth asking about your own team: when you leave the room, what keeps running?

Last time I wrote about the club in the season four premiere that folded its women's side, and what a cut like that says about a community claim. There was a second lesson about community hiding in that same scene, and it took me a literal map to find it.

We learn the name of the women's team at the moment Higgins shares the news. It's Twickenham. I'd never heard of it, so I looked it up.

Twickenham is a town a few miles from real-world Richmond, but you wouldn't know it from the show, because many of the most visually recognizable things shown happening in Richmond were filmed there. Twickenham's Church Street serves as Richmond's High Street. The iconic phone booths where Lasso is regularly told off [rhymes with ‘banker’] by the old man in a scarf? Twickenham.

But, that's the thing about TV and movies. We allow for and almost expect that kind of trick. People who watch the show and give it a moment's thought can't really be upset that this fictional team doesn't play in a Richmond stadium that doesn't exist, or in their downtown that lacked the vibe the show sought to convey. We enjoy what's presented and go with it. Richmond's pub is actually in Twickenham? It's not relevant to our appreciation of the show. We sign up for the lie the moment we decide to watch a show about a fictional football team. It's baked in.

That's very different from the lessons learned from real communities. Imagine your actual hometown getting quietly swapped out and used to advertise a different town that has nothing to do with yours, and they don't tell you they're doing it. That's the sort of thing that starts with lawyers and just gets messier and messier. You can't steal a town's identity and not expect consequences.

Or, if your local club's foundation talks about "your community" for years, but the community it's actually supporting is on the other side of the state? Someone's getting sued.

The fictional and real-world examples are basically making the same move. One place standing in for another. But one version is harmless and the other one stings. The substitution isn't what separates them. What separates them is whether you agreed, and whether you had anything riding on it. You opted into the Richmond story willingly. You never opted into a false community claim, and have a real investment in what happens to your town.

If you've been a fan of a team that's left town, you've felt this. [RIP Baltimore Colts, who left town in the middle of the night, March 28, 1984. I can still remember the images of Mayflower moving vans driving their stuff off property.] We fans accept substitution when it entertains or benefits us. [Indianapolis seems just fine with the Colts move.] But it's betrayal when it costs. It's not hypocritical to feel it here, but not on screen.

So the test for whether a pretense is harmless or a betrayal comes down to two questions. Did everyone agree to it? And did anyone have something real riding on it? The show passes both. Everyone consented and nobody loses anything when Church Street plays dress-up. The club that spends years saying "your community" and then proves otherwise fails both. Nobody told you it was a performance, and you had loyalty, money, and maybe a piece of your identity invested in it being true.

What I see underneath this one: organizations don't just have a gap between what they say and what they do. They also have an audience keeping score, and the audience's read is built from everything it was allowed to see. Keep the performance going long enough and the audience builds its loyalty on the performance. When the truth surfaces, they don't just lose the claim. They lose everything they built on it. That's why the reaction is rage and lawsuits instead of a shrug.

If you want to try it for yourself... Pick one meaningful promise your organization makes to people outside it. Customers, a neighborhood, a profession, whoever. Now ask two questions. First: if we stopped honoring this tomorrow, would anything inside the organization break? A missed number, a stalled process, a team that would notice by Friday. Second: how long before the people we made the promise to would find out? If the answers are "nothing breaks" and "not for years," then nothing is actually carrying that promise. Nobody owns it. Nothing measures it. It stays alive only because the people outside keep believing it. A promise like that is a debt you haven't been billed for yet. Either wire it into something that would break, or stop making it.

The show borrowed a town and nobody minded, because everyone knew the deal. Is your organization ‘borrowing someone’s town’, and if so, do they know and agree to it?

Lessons from a Fictional Football Club is a series of unofficial analysis and commentary. It is not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by Apple, Warner Bros., or anyone connected with the television series Ted Lasso. Loadmap is the framework I think with in these posts. Loadmap, by Tate Linden, is offered exclusively by Stokefire. 

Get The Load directly in your inbox